ASHU MALAKAR AND 27 ORS v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS
WP(C)/3738/2022 · 2025-06-24
Sanjay Kumar Medhi
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12790 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12790 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/7 GAHC010107962022
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3738/2022 ASHU MALAKAR AND 27 ORS VENDOR NO.14 S/O LATE MAHENDRA MALAKAR,BONOMALI ROAD, WARD NO.13, PO. AND DIST. KARIMGANJ, ASSAM 2: SALIM UDDIN VENDOR NO. 13 S/O LATE MOIN UDDIN
R/O. WARD NO.10 VILLAGE- BONOMALI P.O. AND DIST. KARIMGANJ ASSAM 3: DHARONI MOHAN ROY VENDOR NO. 46 BROJENDRA ROAD WARD NO. 7 P.O. AND DIST. KARIMGANJ ASSAM 4: NARMODA ROY VENDOR NO. 47 BROJENDRA ROAD WARD NO. 7 P.O. AND DIST. KARIMGANJ ASSAM 5: ROMONI MOHAN KURI VENDOR NO. 69 VILLAGE CHORAKURI WARD NO. 7
P.O. AND DIST. KARIMGANJ
Page No.# 2/7 ASSAM 6: SWAPAN SAHA S/O. LATE RASHIK LAL SAHA VENDOR NO. 45 SUBASH NAGAR WARD NO. 15 P.O. AND DIST. KARIMGANJ ASSAM. 7: ABDUL QUYUM MIA VENDOR NO. 56 WARD NO.5 L.C. ROAD LOKENATH SARONI KARIMGANJ ASSAM. 8: ABUL HUSSAIN S/O. LATE HAKAI MIA VENDOR NO. 55 WARD NO.5 L.C. ROAD LOKENATH SARONI KARIMGANJ ASSAM 9: SUBASH ROY S/O. LATE SUKHENDU ROY VENDOR NO. 40 WARD NO. 7 TILAK CHAND ROAD KARIMGANJ ASSAM 10: RUPAK DAS S/O. LATE DINESH DAS VENDOR NO. 78 HOSPITAL ROAD WARD NO. 17 KARIMGANJ ASSAM 11: SATYA BHUSHAN SAHA S/O. LATE KISHORI MOHAN SAHA VENDOR NO. 7 WARD NO. 15 KARIMGANJ
Page No.# 3/7 ASSAM 12: SUNIL SAHA S/O. LATE SAITYA BUSHAN SAHA VENDOR NO. 18 KARIMGANJ ASSAM 13: SUSHANTA SAHA S/O. LATE SAITYA BUSHAN SAHA VENDOR NO. 6 BONOMALI ROAD KARIMGANJ ASSAM 14: SUSHIL MALAKAR VENDOR NO. 42 BONOMALI ROAD WARD NO. 15KARIMGANJ ASSAM 15: MINTU MALAKAR S/O. BIDHAN MALAKAR (OPEN MARKET) WARD NO.13 BRONOMALI ROAD KARIMGANJ ASSAM 16: AMAR DAS S/O. DHANONJOY DAS VENDOR NO.1 (DRAIN SIDE) WARD NO. 22 ROY NAGAR KARIMGANJ ASSAM 17: NITU KURI VENDOR NO. 5 (DRAIN SIDE) VILL- CHORAKURI WARD NO. 7 KARIMGANJ ASSAM 18: DULU GOPE S/O. LATE RAMESH GOPE VENDOR NO. 8 DASPATTI
Page No.# 4/7
WARD NO. 19 KARIMGANJ ASSAM 19: TAPASH ROY S/O LATE ROMA KANTA ROY S.L. NO. 43 WARD NO. 8 NAYABARI TILLABAZAR KARIMGANJ ASSAM 20: CHANCHAL KANTI DAS S/O. LATE JOGENDRA DAS PURKAYASTHA VENDOR NO. 68 WARD NO. 19 R.M.M. MARKET KARIMGANJ ASSAM 21: ANIL KURI S.L. NO. 41 (OPEN MARKET)
S/O.LATE HIRENDRAKURI WARD NO. 7 CHORAKURI KARIMGANJ ASSAM 22: ANUTOSH KURI S.L. NO.
34 S/O. LATE HIRENDRA KURI VILL- CHORAKURI WARD NO.7 KARIMGANJ ASSAM 23: ABDUL KHALIQUE VENDOR NO. 49
S/O. LATE ABDUR RAHIM WARD NO. 10 VILL- BETAIL KARIMGANJ ASSAM
Page No.# 5/7 24: SALIK AHMED SL. NO. 1 S/O. LATE ABDUR RAHIM WARD NO. 10 VILL- BETAIL KARIMGANJ ASSAM 25: MINA MODOK D/O. RAMESH CH. SARKAR S.L. NO.46 A.C. SEN ROAD (NEAR H.P.O.) WARD NO. 12 KARIMGANJ ASSAM 26: RUP KUMAR MODOK S.L. NO.42 A.C. SEN ROAD WARD NO. 12 (NEW) KARIMGANJ ASSAM 27: BISWAJIT SEN S/O. SURENDRA SEN S.L. NO. 31 UMAPATI P.O. AMBARKANA KARIMGANJ ASSAM 28: MONOJIT DAS VENDOR NO. 1 2
S/O LATE SRIBASH DAS VILL- UJANDHI KARNOMADHU KARIMGANJ ASSA VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6. Page No.# 6/7 2:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KARIMGANJ ASSAM 3:THE CIRCLE OFFICER KARIMGANJ CIRCLE KARIMGANJ ASSAM 4:THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER KARIMGANJ MUNICIPAL BOARD KARIMGANJ ASSAM 5:THE CHAIRMAN KARIMGANJ MUNICIPAL BOARD KARIMGANJ ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S P CHOUDHURY, MS B DEVI,MR K BISWAKARMA Advocate for the Respondent : SC, REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPT, MD F FARIDI (r-5),MISS S ROY (r-5),MR. A DHAR (r-5),GA, ASSAM
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI ORDER 25.06.2025
Heard Shri S.P. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Shri B.J. Talukdar, learned Addl. Senior Government Advocate as well as Shri A. Dhar, learned counsel for the respondent no. 5. Shri Dhar, the learned counsel has submitted that during the pendency of this writ petition, a resolution was adopted to accommodate the vendors which include the petitioners. Shri Choudhury, the learned counsel for the petitioners however submits
Page No.# 7/7 that the clients are not in touch and he has not been equipped with the latest instructions.
Be that as it may, in view of the categorical submission which has been recorded above and even on the earlier occasion, this Court is of the opinion that there may not be any live cause of action which requires further adjudication. The writ petition is accordingly closed. It is needless to state that for any further grievance, the petitioners would be at liberty to approach the appropriate forum. JUDGE Comparing Assistant