-1- 2025:CGHC:17342 NAFR HIGH COURT of CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1370 of 2017 1 - Yuvaraj Singh Druw S/o Sunder Singh Druw, Aged About 26 Years R/o Village Bijrakapa Kala , Post Lalpur, Tahsil Lormi, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh. 2 - Kamalnarayan Koshale, S/o Komal Das Koshale, Aged About 27 Years R/o Village Gajiya, Nawagaon, P. O. And Tahsil, Mungeli, District Mungeli, District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Agriculture Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Director, Directorate Agriculture Department, Chhattisgarh Government, Labhandi, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3- Deputy Director, Agriculture Estb., Directorate Agriculture Department, Chhattisgarh Government, Labhandi, Raipur, District Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Chhattisgarh Professional Examination Board, Through Its Controller, Vyapam Bhawan, North Block, Sector 19, Naya Raipur, E-Mail Id. Cgvyapam@gmail.com., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) (Cause Title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : None For State : Ms. Neelima Singh Thakur, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No.4 : Mr. Yogendra Pandey, Advocate, holding the brief of Mr. Animesh Tiwari, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 15.04.2025 1) The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- Digitally signed by NADIM MOHLE -2- “10.1 This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ / direction / order commanding the respondents to quash the advertisement dated 15-02-2017 bearing Memo No. / Est./A-1A / Direct Recruitment / 2017/133 calling application for appointment on the post of Senior Agriculture Development officer and to republish such advertisement as per applicable Rules. 10.2 Any other relief(s), which may deems fit, looking to the facts & circumstances of the case may be given to the Petitioners.” 2) The petitioner, by filing the instant petition, has challenged the advertisement dated 15.02.2017, issued by respondent No.3 for the post of Senior Agriculture Development officer. 3) Learned counsel appearing for the State would submit that the aforesaid recruitment process has already been completed and candidates from various categories have already been appointed but the petitioner has not arrayed those candidates as respondents. 4) Taking into consideration the fact that recruitment process has already been completed and the selected candidates have not been arrayed as respondents, no case is made out for interference. Accordingly, this writ petition is hereby dismissed. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Nadim