[2025:RJ-JP:23727] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 4284/2025 Hari Ram Meena @ Hari Meena S/o Shri Mithhu Lal Meena, age 25 years, R/o Village Sunari Police Station Niwai, District Tonk, Currently Resident Of Plot No. 06, Ajmera Colony, Bajni Talai, P.s Muhana, District Jaipur. (Presently accused-petitioner is confined in Central Jail, Jaipur) ----Petitioner Versus Additional Public Prosecutor, Through Rajasthan Government. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Deepak Chauhan, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jitendra Singh Rathore, Addl. G.A. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA Order 30/06/2025 1. The 2nd bail application has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. by the petitioner in connection with FIR No.432/2021 registered at Police Station Sanganer Sadar, Jaipur City (South) for the offence under Section 302 IPC (later on offence(s) under Sections 302, 396 and 120-B IPC were found to have been made out). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He is behind the bars since 05.12.2022. Charge-sheet has been filed against the petitioner. Out of 51 witnesses, only 3 witnesses have been examined by the trial court till today. Similarly situated co-accused Babu Lal and Ramkesh @ Binnu have been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 08.03.2022 [2025:RJ-JP:23727] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4284/2025] passed in Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.20131/2021. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that nothing was recovered from the petitioner. There is no eye witness in the present case. Conclusion of trial may take long time. So, the petitioner be enlarged on bail. 3. Learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the State has opposed the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner and submits that petitioner and other co-accused committed murder of Nanchi Lal for dacoity. Complainant had identified the accused. So, the 2nd bail application filed by the petitioner be dismissed. 4. I have considered the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Government Advocate. 5. Allegation against the petitioner is that petitioner and other co-accused committed murder of Nanchi Lal for dacoity. So, looking to the nature of allegations and gravity of the offences levelled against the accused-petitioner, I do not consider it a fit case to grant bail to the accused-petitioner. 6. Hence, the 2nd bail application filed by the petitioner stands dismissed. (NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J Jatin/11