Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 127840 (ALL)

SMT. ANITA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. LKO AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/2410/2025 · 2025-03-11

Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:14870-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 2410 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Anita Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ganga Prasad Mishra,Abhinav Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. 1. Heard. 2. Whether the deceased used to work on the agricultural field recorded in the name of his father is a factual issue, which cannot be gone into under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. However, at this stage, learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file afresh. 3. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed provided that he is able to prove from the documents filed with the claim that the deceased was covered under the scheme. (Om Prakash Shukla, J.) (Rajan Roy, J.) Order Date :- 11.3.2025 -Piyush- Digitally signed by :- PIYUSH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- PIYUSH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench