Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12784 (JHR)

PRADEEP KUMAR SINGH And ORS v. STATE OF JHARKHAND And ORS

WPC/4710/2008 · 2025-07-30

Anil Kumar Choudhary

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:21083] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.4710 of 2008 ------ 1. Pradeep Kumar Singh, S/o Sri R.P. Singh 2. Sri Krishna Prasad Singh @ Krishna Singh, S/o Late Shaligram Singh 3. Harish Chandra Gupta, S/o Late Mishir Gupta 4. Rita Devi, W/o Ranjan Kumar 5. Chinta Devi, W/o Ram Laxman Sharma @ Laxman Mistry 6. Ram Chandra Sharma, S/o Jago Sinha 7. Debashish Prasad Sinha, S/o K. P. Sinha 8. Veena Kumar, D/o D.P. Sinha & W/o Ashok Kumar Sinha 9. Tanuja Singh, W/o Bimlendu Kumar Singh 10. Urmila Devi, W/o S. N. Sahay 11. Shakeela Devi, W/o Ayodhya Prasad 12. Suresh Kumar Ram, S/o Doman Ram 1-12 all resident of Dhuikar Nagar PO Hatia P.S. Jagannathpur Dist Ranchi … Petitioners Versus 1. State of Jharkhand 2. Dy. Commissioner, Ranchi 3. The Spl. Officer, Scheduled Area Regulation, Ranchi 4. Lalit Kachhap, S/o Late Kunwar Oraon, Village- Hinoo, PS: Doranda, PO: Hinoo, Ranchi 5. Birsa Kujur, S/o Late Jaura Oraon, Res. Of Birsa Nagar (Birsa Chowk), PS: Jagannathpur, PO: Hatia Ranchi. … Respondents ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : None For the Respondents : Mr. Jayant Franklin Toppo, GA V ------ Order No:-06 Dated:-30-07-2025 No one turns up on behalf of the petitioners in spite of repeated calls. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that since there is no merit in this Writ Petition, hence, the petitioners are not diligent in prosecuting this Writ Petition. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/