SMT NEETU AGRAHARI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. ENERGY GOVT. U.P. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/2605/2025 · 2025-03-24
Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 127836 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 127836 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:17009-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 2605 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt Neetu Agrahari Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Energy Govt. U.P. Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shiv Kumar,Rohit Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Manish Jauhari Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. 1.) Heard. 2.) The petitioner challenges a recovery certificate dated 18.10.2024 sent by the Officer of the Electricity Corporation to the Collector, Amethi for recovering an amount of Rs. 2,54,215/- from the petitioner as arrears of land revenue, as the electricity dues had not been paid. 3.) The submission is that on 27.10.2020 a notice for temporary disconnection was given asking the petitioner to pay an amount of Rs. 71,745/- which was not paid by the petitioner, but instead of disconnecting the electricity connection, now, recovery certificate has been issued for recovery of a highly exorbitant amount. However, on being asked as to whether he has consumed electricity or not, he says that he has not consumed electricity. 4.) Learned Standing Counsel for the Electricity Corporation says that the recovery is not for any electricity consumption after 2020, but it is the amount which was proposed to be recovered in the said year which has escalated. 5.) We are of the view that details as to how the amount which was Rs. 71,745/- on 27.10.2020 has escalated to Rs. 2,54,215/-, be provided to the petitioner by the opposite party no. 4 within one week. Thereafter, if aggrieved, the petitioner may challenge the same as per law. Only for a week or till such communication is sent by the opposite party no. 4, the recovery shall remain in abeyance. 6.) The writ petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. Order Date :- 24.3.2025/Lokesh Kumar [Om Prakash Shukla, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.] Digitally signed by :- LOKESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench