TAUSHIF AHAMAD KHAN AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
A227/1311/2025 · 2025-03-11
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 127828 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 127828 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:14818 Court No. - 19 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1311 of 2025 Petitioner :- Taushif Ahamad Khan And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Gauri Shankar Maurya,Divya Maurya Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned State Counsel for opposite parties no.1 and 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed notice to opposite party no.3 stands dispensed with. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the authority concerned for expeditious disposal of application for restoration filed by the petitioner bearing no.11759 of 2025 in the mutation case no.2767/2023. However, a perusal of order sheet clearly indicates the fact that the said application is pending consideration on account of continuous boycott calls of the Bar Association concerned. In such circumstances no specific time frame can be
directed to the authority concerned when the parties themselves are not co-operating in the early conclusion of the proceedings. It shall however be open to the authority concerned to decide the said application expeditiously subject to co- operation by the parties. With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of.
Order Date :- 11.3.2025 mks Digitally signed by :- MANISH SAXENA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench