SRI NARAYAN TIWARI @ RAJ TIWARI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/2190/2025 · 2025-04-07
Manish Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 127811 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 127811 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:19368 Court No. - 14 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2190 of 2025 Applicant :- Sri Narayan Tiwari @ Raj Tiwari Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Manjeet Singh,Amrendra Bakhsha Das Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State-respondent and perused the record.
2. Present case has been preferred under Section 482 Cr.P.C./528 B.N.S.S. with the following main reliefs:-
"Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash/set-aside the impugned charge sheet dated 9.7.2022 arising out of Case Crime No.20/2022, Under Sections: 420, 409, 467, 468, 471, 34, 120-B IPC, Police Station: PGI, District: Lucknow as well as cognizance/ summoning order dated 13.7.2022 passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate- Lucknow in Criminal Case No.62929/2022 (State Versus Jagat Narayan Shukla & Others) including entire criminal proceeding initiated in pursuance thereof, so far it relates with the petitioner, as contained in Annexure No.1&2 respectively to this Petition. It is also prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to stay the entire proceeding initiated in pursuance of the impugned charge sheet dated 9.7.2022 arising out of Case Crime No.20/2022, Under Sections: 420, 409, 467, 468, 471, 34, 120-B IPC, Police Station: PGI, District: Lucknow as well as cognizance/ summoning order dated 13.7.2022 passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate Lucknow in Criminal Case No.62929/2022 (State Versus Jagat Narayan Shukla & Others) during pendency of the instant petition in the interest of justice."
3. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant does not want to press the present case as such, it may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to move a discharge application before the Court concerned.
4. As such, the present application is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to the applicant to move discharge application before the court concerned. If any such application is preferred, the court concerned shall decide it expeditiously in accordance with law, if there is no any other legal impediment. Order Date :- 7.4.2025 AKK Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench