Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12778 (RAJ)

RAJENDRA SHARMA SON OF SHRI DAMODAR SHRAMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/1703/2025 · 2025-07-17

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:26799] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No.1703/2025 1. Rajendra Sharma Son Of Shri Damodar Shrama, Aged About 58 Years, Resident Of 54-53, Bawadi Walon Ka Makah, Bhuriya Ki Pyau, Agra Marg, Janta Colony, Jaipur (Raj). 2. Arun Sharma Son Of Rajkumar Sharma, Aged About 32 Years, Resident Of House No. 106, Kagdiwada Mount Road, Police Station Brahmpuri, Jaipur. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. 2. Giriraj Singh Son Of Shri Mohabhat Singh, Resident Of Rajputo Ki Dhani, Vijaypura Purani Chungi, Agra Road, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Meghraj Meena, Adv. For Respondent(s) For Complainant : : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP Mr. Gaurav Sharma, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 17/07/2025 1. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS for quashing the FIR No.202/2024, registered at Police Station Brahmpuri, District Jaipur City (North) for the offences under Sections 420, 406, 419, 467, 471, 468, 323, 341 and 120-B of IPC. 2. Learned Public Prosecutor has submitted the factual report, the same is taken on record. 3. Considering the factual report, this Court is not inclined to endorse the compromise, the offences shown against the [2025:RJ-JP:26799] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-1703/2025] petitioner is grave and against the society at large, the petitioner has indulged into malpractice and obtained amount from the complainant on the pretext of employment. 4. Therefore, the present petition for quashing of the FIR on the basis of compromise entered between the parties is hereby by dismissed. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-211