[2025:JHHC:16906] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.5051 of 2025 ------ Pushpa Tirkey @ Pushpa Kelara Tirkey aged about 55 Years D/O Late Agastus Tirkey R/O Village- Nutan Nagar Jabra Korrah P.O. & P.S.- Korrah District- Hazaribagh (Jharkhand). .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Kripa Shankar Nanda, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sardhu Mahto, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-25-06-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with S.T. Case No.474 of 2011 arising out of Patratu (Bhurkunda) P.S. Case No.36 of 2000 (G.R. Case No.415 of 2000) registered for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed murder of Laliya. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is also submitted that the co-accused Phulkaria @ Phool Kumari Tirkey who faced the trial has since been acquitted vide judgment dated 09.01.2015 passed in Sessions Trial Case No.119 of 2006. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in this case only because she is the sister of co-accused Phulkaria @ Phool Kumari Tirkey. It is then submitted that charge has already been framed. It is then submitted that the other co-accused Rafique Ansari has already been acquitted vide judgment passed in the said Sessions Trial Case No.119 of 2006 dated 09.01.2015. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 30.01.2025 as is evident from para-1 of the instant bail application. It is also submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-12 of the instant bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner also undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Addl. Sessions Judge-I, Hazaribagh in connection with S.T. Case No.474 of 2011 arising out of Patratu (Bhurkunda) P.S. Case No.36 of 2000 (G.R. Case No.415 of 2000) with the condition that he will co- operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/