DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD v. ROHIT ARORA
RSA/5591/2019 · 2025-11-19
Nidhi Gupta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 127776 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 127776 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
RSA-5591-
IN THE HIG 273
Dakshin Har
Rohit Arora
CORAM: H
Present: - NIDHI GUP
1.
concurrent j whereby the respondent
2.
that the que jurisdiction Electricity A Bench of th Sub Division
3.
and the suit ground of ju take recours law.
-2019 (O&M)
-1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HA
RSA
Date o
Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd.
Versus Arora
M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH
Mr. RS Longia, Advocate for th
I GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
The appellant-defendant is in rrent judgments and decrees rendere by the suit for declaration and perm dent-plaintiff was decreed.
At the very outset, learned cou e question of law involved in the p ction of the Civil Court is barred in icity Act, 2003, has since been decid of this Court in RSA-4181-2016, ti ivisional Officer and Another’ vide j
In view of the above, the prese e suit filed by the respondent-plain d of jurisdiction. However, the respon ecourse to the appropriate remedy as
ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-5591-2019 (O&M) Date of Decision: 19.11.2025
.… Appellant
.... Respondent
NIDHI GUPTA for the appellant. is in second appeal against the endered by both the Courts below permanent injunction filed by the d counsel for the appellant submits the present appeal as to whether red in view of Section 145 of the decided by the Hon’ble Division , titled as ‘Mahesh Kumar vs. vide judgment dated 14.05.2025. e present second appeal is allowed, plaintiff stands dismissed on the respondent-plaintiff is at liberty to dy as available, in accordance with the low the
ther the sion vs.
the y to with RISHU KATARIA 2025.11.20 11:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment.
RSA-5591-
4.
made in the judicata in plaintiff.
5.
6.
Registered P the address m
19.11.2025 rishu
-2019 (O&M)
-2-
It is made clear that any ev in the impugned judgments and decr in any subsequent proceedings
Pending application(s), if any, s
Registry is directed to send a ered Post to respondent-plaintiff/Rohi dress mentioned in the Memo of Partie 2025
Whether speaking/reasoned
Whether Reportable
ny evidence recorded/observations d decrees would not operate as res ings initiated by the respondent- any, shall stands disposed of. send a copy of this order through Rohit Arora S/o Jagdish Arora, at Parties.
( NIDHI GUPTA )
JUDGE Yes/No
Yes/No ions es ugh at RISHU KATARIA 2025.11.20 11:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment.