Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 127776 (PNJ)

DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD v. ROHIT ARORA

RSA/5591/2019 · 2025-11-19

Nidhi Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

RSA-5591- IN THE HIG 273 Dakshin Har Rohit Arora CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. concurrent j whereby the respondent 2. that the que jurisdiction Electricity A Bench of th Sub Division 3. and the suit ground of ju take recours law. -2019 (O&M) -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HA RSA Date o Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. Versus Arora M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Mr. RS Longia, Advocate for th I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The appellant-defendant is in rrent judgments and decrees rendere by the suit for declaration and perm dent-plaintiff was decreed. At the very outset, learned cou e question of law involved in the p ction of the Civil Court is barred in icity Act, 2003, has since been decid of this Court in RSA-4181-2016, ti ivisional Officer and Another’ vide j In view of the above, the prese e suit filed by the respondent-plain d of jurisdiction. However, the respon ecourse to the appropriate remedy as ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-5591-2019 (O&M) Date of Decision: 19.11.2025 .… Appellant .... Respondent NIDHI GUPTA for the appellant. is in second appeal against the endered by both the Courts below permanent injunction filed by the d counsel for the appellant submits the present appeal as to whether red in view of Section 145 of the decided by the Hon’ble Division , titled as ‘Mahesh Kumar vs. vide judgment dated 14.05.2025. e present second appeal is allowed, plaintiff stands dismissed on the respondent-plaintiff is at liberty to dy as available, in accordance with the low the ther the sion vs. the y to with RISHU KATARIA 2025.11.20 11:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. RSA-5591- 4. made in the judicata in plaintiff. 5. 6. Registered P the address m 19.11.2025 rishu -2019 (O&M) -2- It is made clear that any ev in the impugned judgments and decr in any subsequent proceedings Pending application(s), if any, s Registry is directed to send a ered Post to respondent-plaintiff/Rohi dress mentioned in the Memo of Partie 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable ny evidence recorded/observations d decrees would not operate as res ings initiated by the respondent- any, shall stands disposed of. send a copy of this order through Rohit Arora S/o Jagdish Arora, at Parties. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No ions es ugh at RISHU KATARIA 2025.11.20 11:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.