Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 127765 (MAD)

Abudahir v. State of Tamil Nadu Represented by

WP(MD)/7213/2025 · 2025-03-18

P Dhanabal

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P(MD)No.7213 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 18.03.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL W.P(MD)No.7213 of 2025 Abudahir ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by, The Commissioner of Police, Trichy City, Trichy. 2.The Inspector of Police, Ariyamangalam Police Station, Trichy District. 3.Sagayaraj 4.Kaja ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 herein to take necessary action against the respondents 3 to 4 based on the petitioner's representation, dated 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.7213 of 2025 20.01.2024 and 22.01.2024 within a period that may be stipulated by this Court and pass such further or other orders as this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Anwar Hussain For R-1 & R-2 : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi Additional Public Prosecutor ORDER The present petition has been filed for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 herein to take necessary action against the respondents 3 to 4 based on the petitioner's representations, dated 20.01.2024 and 22.01.2024. 2. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the official respondents would submit that already the representations of the petitioner was considered and closed on 30.03.2024 as mistake of fact. The petitioner also participated in the proceedings and already the copy also served to the petitioner. However, today, based on the direction of this Court, once again served the copy to the petitioner. Therefore, it is 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.7213 of 2025 for the petitioner to take appropriate steps to challenge the closure of the complaint in the manner known to law, if he is aggrieved. 3. In view of the same, by preserving the liberty of the petitioner to challenge the closure of the complaint in the manner known to law, this writ petition stands closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 18.03.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes BTR To 1.The Commissioner of Police, Trichy City, Trichy. 2.The Inspector of Police, Ariyamangalam Police Station, Trichy District. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.7213 of 2025 P.DHANABAL, J. BTR W.P(MD)No.7213 of 2025 18.03.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis