PINTU @ MOHAMMAD IRFAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO.
A482/2189/2025 · 2025-03-10
Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 127760 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 127760 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:14460 Court No. - 12 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2189 of 2025 Applicant :- Pintu @ Mohammad Irfan Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Uma Kant Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record. The instant application has been filed by the applicant to permit him to submit two sureties and personal bond in all the cases in which he was roped and has been granted bail by the court concerned.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in five cases. He next submitted that in all the cases registered against the applicant, he has been granted bail by the court concerned. He says that the applicant is a very poor person and not in a position to furnish huge sureties in each and every case in compliance of bail orders. It is further submitted that the details of cases registered against applicant at District Raebareli are as follows:-
1. Case Crime No. 305 of 2022, under Section 392, 411 I.P.C., P.S.- Harchandpur, District- Raebareli.
2. Case Crime No. 306 of 2022, under Section 392, 411 I.P.C., P.S.- Harchandpur, District- Raebareli.
3. Case Crime No. 543 of 2022, under Section 467, 468, 471 I.P.C., P.S.- Bachhrawan, District- Raebareli.
4. Case Crime No. 535 of 2022, under Section 392, 411 I.P.C., P.S.- Bachhrawan, District- Raebareli.
5. Case Crime No. 639 of 2022, under Section 2/3 U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, P.S.- Bachhrawan, District- Raebareli.
Learned counsel for the applicant has relied upon the judgment of the Apex Court passed in Special Leave to Appeal
(Criminal) No. 8914-8915 of 2018; Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky Vs. State of U.P. Learned A.G.A. submits that he does not want to file any counter affidavit. In view of the facts and circumstances as well as rival
submissions advanced by the learned counsel for both the parties, the present application stands disposed of finally in the light law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky (Supra) and the Court below is directed to execute the personal bond of Rs. 20,000/- in every case and produce two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court/Magistrate concerned in one case which shall hold good for rest of the cases.
Order Date :- 10.3.2025 Arun/- Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench