- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:1035 WP No. 235 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 235 OF 2021 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: THE HIRASUGAR EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., SANKESHWAR, REP BY ITS MANAGER, ARUN GURAPPA CHARATI, S/O GURAPPA CHARATI, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, NH 4, HIRASUGAR FACTORY AREA, SANKESHWAR POST, HUKKERI TALUK-591 314. BELGAUM DISTRICT. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ROOPESHA.B., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, CO-OPERATION DEPARTMENT, KARNATAKA GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, ROOM NO 610, 3RD GATE, 6TH FLOOR, M.S.BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE STATE CO-OPERATIVE ELECTION AUTHORITY, 3RD FLOOR, SHANTHI NAGAR, T.T.M.C. KHB ROAD, BENGALURU-560 002. 3. THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, NO.1, ALI-ASKAR ROAD, Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:1035 WP No. 235 of 2021 BENGALURU-560 052. REPRESENTED BY REGISTRAR. 4. THE KARNATAKA STATE CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK FEDERATION LTD., NO.132, K.H.ROAD, BENGALURU-560 027. 5. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, (ADMINISTRATION-I), BRUHATH BENGALURU MAHANAGAR PALIKE, BENGALURU AND RETURNING OFFICER, THE KARNATAKA STATE CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK FEDERATION LTD., NO.132. K.H.ROAD, BENGALURU-560 027. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MANJUNATHA RAYAPPA., AGA FOR R1, 3 & 5; SRI. G.V. SHASHI KUMAR., ADVOCATE FOR R2; R4-SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. Sri.Manjunatha Rayappa., AGA for respondents 1, 3 and 5 has appeared in person. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:1035 WP No. 235 of 2021 As could be seen from the petition papers, the petition was filed in the year 2021 i.e., on 05.01.2021 and the office has raised certain objections on 06.01.2021. Now we are in the month of January 2025. The petition is pending from four years. So far, office objections are not complied with. As already noted above, when the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the Writ Petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution and also for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 3 Sl No.: 13