- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19714 WP No. 1301 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM WRIT PETITION NO. 1301 OF 2019 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN: SRI. V. KUPPUSWAMY, S/O LATE VENKATACHALAM, AGED 73 YEARS, R/AT NO.3, C.NO.3RD STREET, IBRAHIM SAHEB, STREET CROSS, CIVIL STATION, BENGALURU – 560 001. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SATHY D., ADVOCATE FOR SRI.K.V.NARASIMHAN., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. SEETHAMMA, W/O BHUJANGASAYANA, AGED 73 YEARS, R/AT NO.808, 7TH CROSS, MICO EXTENSION, BTM LAYOUT, BENGALURU – 560 003. 2. THE COMMISSIONER, BRUHATH BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE, N.R.SQUARE, BANGALORE – 560 002. Digitally signed by CHAITHRA A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19714 WP No. 1301 of 2019 3. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, BTM LAYOUT SUB - DIVISION, BBMP, NO.16 MAIN ROAD, BTM I STAGE, BENGALURU – 560 068. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M.A.SEBASTIAN, ADVOCATE FOR R-1 AND SRI. OMKAR KAMBI, ADVOCATE FOR R-2 AND 3) THIS WP FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-QUASH THE ORDER AT ANENXURE-H DATED 23.11.2018 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE KARNATAKA APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN APPEAL NO.1083/2015 AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FURTHER HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM ORAL ORDER The learned counsel appearing for respondents No.2 and 3 has filed a memo today, annexing a copy of the order passed by the third respondent pursuant to the remand order issued by the Karnataka Administrative Tribunal in Appeal No.711/2007. In view of the fact that the petitioner has challenged the remand order passed by the Tribunal, and further taking note that a fresh order has - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19714 WP No. 1301 of 2019 now been passed by the authority post-remand by Tribunal, this writ petition no longer survives for consideration. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. The memo reporting the death of respondent No.1 is also taken on record. However, since the writ petition itself has become infructuous, no further orders are required to be passed in relation to the death of respondent No.1. Sd/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE HDK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 30