Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 127706 (ALL)

RAM DEO MAURYA v. U.P. JAL NIGAM THRU. MANAGING DIRECTOR (URBAN) LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/2715/2025 · 2025-03-10

Abdul Moin

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:14332 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2715 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ram Deo Maurya Respondent :- U.P. Jal Nigam Thru. Managing Director (Urban) Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sati Prasad Singh @ Satish Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Rishabh Kapoor Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Pawan Kumar Pandey, Advocate who has filed his Vakalatnama today in Court on behalf of all the respondents. With the consent of the parties, the matter is being finally decided. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that despite the petitioner having retired on 31.07.2024, his retiral dues has still not been paid except the General Provident Fund. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2 who is the Senior Accounts Officer (Pension), U.P. Jal Nigam (Urban), Rana Pratap Marg, Lucknow shall calculate / determine the post retiral dues payable to the petitioner and pay the admissible dues as per law positively within a period of four months and while doing so they shall also take a decision as regards the interest payable on the delayed amount as per provisions in the rules and order in this regard from the date it became due and till the date it is actually paid. Order Date :- 10.3.2025 Pachhere/- Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench