Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12767 (HP)

MUNI LAL AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

EX.P./376/2025 · 2025-08-04

Sandeep Sharma

Special Leave Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.376 of 2025 Date of Decision: 04.08.2025 _____________________________________________________________________ Muni Lal and Others ……...Petitioners Versus State of H.P. and Others …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioners: Mr. Dikken Kumar Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General, with Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar and Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocates General, with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for State. Mr. V.B. Verma, Central Govt. Counsel, for the respondent No.7-UOI. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral): While placing on record communication dated 02.08.2025, issued under the signatures of Executive Engineer, HPPWD Division, Seeraj at Jhanjheli, Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General, states that mandate contained in the judgment, sought to be executed, has been decided to be complied with. 2. Having perused aforesaid communication, which is taken on record, this Court finds that matter was taken-up with the Government and Government vide letter dated 28.07.2025 has conveyed its approval to implement the judgment, subject to outcome of SLP, pending before the Hon’ble Apex Court. Necessary directions 2 have also been issued to LAC (MZ) HPPWD, Mandi, vide letter dated 31.07.2025 to process the necessary papers for issuance of notification. Papers for issuance of notification are being prepared and notification shall be issued at the earliest. 3. In view of aforesaid communication, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings and accordingly the same is disposed of, with the direction to respondents to ensure that notification under Section 11 is issued expeditiously, preferably, within a period of four weeks and thereafter, entire process of acquisition is completed, within statutory period. Liberty is reserved to the petitioner to get the present petition revived, in case needful, as agreed to be done, is not done, within stipulated time. August 04, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), (Rajeev Raturi) Judge