RAM PRASAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. AND OTHERS
CRLP/2055/2025 · 2025-03-17
Brij Raj Singh, Vivek Chaudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 127668 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 127668 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:15594-DB Court No. - 10 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 2055 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ram Prasad Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Parmanand Gupta Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. This is a petition filed for the following main relief:
"i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus, commanding the opposite party no.1 to take appropriate action Under Section-4, Scheduled castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, against to opposite party no.2 to 4 with respect to noncompliance of Under Section 18-A, Scheduled castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and under section 5, Scheduled castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Rules, 1995."
3. Sri Parmanand Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner states that initially an application under Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C. (173(4) of B.N.S.S., 2023) was filed for lodging of F.I.R., which was rejected by the Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Barabanki, by order dated 10.2.2025 in Case No.77 of 2025 "Ram Prasad vs. Balram Singh and others". Now the petitioner has filed the present writ petition before this Court.
4. It was repeatedly asked from learned counsel for the petitioner Sri Parmanand Gupta as to what proceedings are to be initiated after rejection of application under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. (173(4) of B.N.S.S., 2023). He refuses to answer the query of the Court.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner is cautioned to file petitions after studying the matter properly.
6. The writ petition is dismissed. . [Brij Raj Singh,J.] [Vivek Chaudhary,J.] Order Date :- 17.3.2025 Sachin Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MEHROTRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench