IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.7428 of 2025 a/w connected matters Decided on: 6th May, 2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CWP No.7428 of 2025 Jitender Kumar …..Petitioner Versus H.P. State Forest Corporation & Anr. .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. CWP No.7430 of 2025 Nand Lal …..Petitioner Versus H.P. State Forest Corporation & Anr. .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3. CWP No.7432 of 2025 Mathra Prasad …..Petitioner Versus H.P. State Forest Corporation & Anr. .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4. CWP No.7434 of 2025 Kuldeep Singh …..Petitioner Versus H.P. State Forest Corporation & Anr. .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 For the Petitioners: Mr. Bonit Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Abhishek Nagta, Advocate, in CWP Nos.7428 & 7430 of 2025. Mr. Vishwas Kaushal, Advocate vice Mr. Raman Ravi Verma, Advocate, in CWP Nos.7432 & 7434 of 2025. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. Abhishek Nagta, learned counsel and Mr. Vishwas Kaushal, Advocate vice Mr. Raman Ravi Verma, learned counsel, appear and waive service of notice on behalf of the respondents in the respective petitions. 2. Petitioners are serving in the respondent-H.P. State Forest Development Corporation and have prayed for direction to the respondents to grant them work charge status/regularization of services from the date they completed eight years of service with all incidental benefits. 3. Learned counsel for the parties have jointly submitted that the issue involved in the writ petitions and the reliefs prayed for by the petitioners are now covered by the decision rendered by the Hon’ble Apex Court in The State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. Versus Surajmani & Anr.2. The respondent-Corporation was also the appellant before the Hon’ble Supreme Court in some of the connected 2 Civil Appeal No.1595 of 2025, decided alongwith connected civil appeals on 06.02.2025 3 matters. Learned counsel for the parties also submit that these writ petitions be disposed of in terms of the directions issued in the aforesaid decision. 4. In view of the stand taken by learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the aforesaid judgment, these writ petitions are disposed of with direction to the respondents/competent authority to consider the respective cases of the petitioners in accordance with law laid down in Surajmani2 and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within six weeks from today. Copy of the order so passed, be also communicated to the petitioners. The writ petitions stand disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua May 06, 2025 Judge Mukesh