IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI FRIDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 68 OF 2017 Appeal filed under Section 173 of M.V. Act against the Judgment and Decree dated:30-06-2016 in O.P.No.30 of 2013 on the file of the Motor Vehicle Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-Additional District Judge, Hindupur. Between: The Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Company Limited, Rep resented by its Manager, Office at: 3rd Floor, Bangarupet, Kurnool ...APPELLANT/RESPONDENT N0.2 District. AND 1. Y. Ramakrishna Reddy, S/o.Subbareddy, Aged about: 51 years, Occ: Cultivation, R/o.Mullamothukapalli Village, Parigi Mandal, Anantapuramu Distqct. (Age of the Petitioner is amended as per Orders in lA 289/15 Dt: 06-04-2015) ...RESPONDENT/PETITIONER 2. Chinta Murali Mohan Reddy,, S/o.C.Someswar Reddy, Aged about: Major, Occu: Lorry Owner, R/o.D.No.1-236, Ganesh Nagar, Tadipatri, Ananthapur District. 3. G.Raghunatha Reddy,, S/o.G.Narayanareddy, Aged about 45 years, Occu: Lorry Driver, R/o.Ganesh Nagar, D.No.1/195, Tadipatri Town, Ananthapuramu District, Native of Buyapalli, Hussanapuram Post (R2 is added as per orders in IA 919/15, Dt: 06-08-2015) ...RESPONDENT Nos. 2 to 3/RESPONDENT Nos.1 and 3 -2- I.A. NO: 1 OF 2017fMACMAMP. NO: 248 OF 2017) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the operation of the Judgment and Decree dated 30.06.2016 made in OP NO.30 of 2013 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-Additional District Judge, Anantapur District at Hindupur. Counsel for the Appellant:SRI. CHEKURI SRIPATI RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.liSRI N ASWARTHA NARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 2 and 3:— The Court made the following JUDGMENT: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA - » MAGMA No.68 of 2017 JUDGMENT: Learned counsel for the respondent/claimant alone is present. 2. Despite the matter being posted today i.e., on 09.05.2025 under the caption ‘For Dismissal’, there is no representation for the appellant/lnsurance Company. On 06.03.2025, 17.04.2025 and 02.05.2025, there was no representation for the appellant/lnsurance Company. Therefore, it evinces that the appellant/lnsurance Company 3. has no interest to prosecute the case. Hence, the present MAGMA is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending and the Interim order granted earlier, if any, shall stand closed. SD/- N. NAGAMMA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Chairman, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-cum-Additional District Judge, Hindupur, Ananthapur District, (with records, if any) 2. One CC to SRI. CHEKURI SRIPATI RAO, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to SRI. N ASWARTHA NARAYANA, Advocate [OPUC] 4. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court of A.P.Amaravathi . 5. Three CD Copies RDB PRK HIGH COURT DATED:09/05/2025 JUDGMENT; MACMA.No.68 of 2017 ${ Ot SEP 2025 ’ll: entSectie filial ^5* o> MACMA IS DISMISSED FOR NON PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS