Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12764 (KAR)

MR. NIYAS. K v. THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER

WP/648/2025 · 2025-02-28

Anant Ramanath Hegde

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:8790 WP No. 648 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE WRIT PETITION NO. 648 OF 2025 (L-PF) BETWEEN: MR. NIYAS. K S/O AZEEZ KALLAMVEETTIL, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, RESIDING AT KALLAMVEETTIL HOUSE, VADAKKUMARI POST, MOKKUTHALA, MALAPPURAM, KERALA - 679 574. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ANANTHA KASHYAP H.K, ADVOCATE) AND: THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION, REGIONAL OFFICE, RICHMOND CIRCLE, RAJARAM MOHAN ROY ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 025. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. M. PRADEEP, ADVOCATE) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO A) DIRECTION, DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER AND DISPOSE OF THE PETITIONERS REPRESENTATION DATED 01/10/2024, VIDE ANNEX-A WITHIN A STIPULATED TIME FRAME AND ETC., Digitally signed by C HONNUR SAB Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:8790 WP No. 648 of 2025 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE ORAL ORDER The petition is filed seeking writ of mandamus, consider the representation at Annexure-A dated 01.10.2024. It is noticed that Annexure-A dated 01.10.2024 is the application addressed by the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, who is the sole respondent in this case. In the said application the petitioner makes a claim that date of joining the employment is wrongly mentioned on account of the mistake committed by the employer. 2. Thus, he makes a prayer to make necessary corrections. The petitioner has also annexed Annexure-B issued by his employer, which according to the petitioner reveals the date of joining, the employment is 25.06.2017. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:8790 WP No. 648 of 2025 It is stated that, it is wrongly shown as 19.06.2017 and on that day he was working with the previous employer. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent would submits that application is not yet considered. 4. Under these circumstances, this Court is of the view that, application has to be considered in accordance with law and thereafter, the respondent has to pass appropriate orders after collecting necessary documents from the petitioner to consider the application dated 01.10.2024. 5. The whole exercise will be completed within 4 weeks from the date of receipt of this order. 6. The writ petition is allowed. Sd/- (ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE KBM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 16 CT: BHK