Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 127634 (ALL)

PARASURAM @ RAM PRASAD AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

A482/2236/2025 · 2025-03-11

Karunesh Singh Pawar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:14865 Court No. - 16 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2236 of 2025 Applicant :- Parasuram @ Ram Prasad And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Deo Raj Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Rajesh Kumar Anand Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A. for the State as well as Shri Rajesh Kumar Anand, learned Advocate who has filed vakalatnama on behalf of respondent no. 2 along with counter affidavit which is taken on record. Learned counsel for the parties submit that compromise was entered between the parties and vide order dated 27.01.2025 both the parties were directed to appear before the concerned court/trial court for verification of the compromise deed which is on record as Annexure No. 3 to the petition. In compliance of the order dated 27.01.2025, on 12.02.2025 the petitioners as well as respondent no. 2 were present before the A.C.J.M.-1, Lakhimpur Kheri and in their presence the compromise has been verified by him. The order whereby the compromise has been verified, is on record as Annexure No. 4 to the petition. Learned counsel for the parties submit that since the parties have amicably settled their dispute outside the Court by entering into compromise and the said compromise has been verified under the order of the Court, hence, in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of "Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab" reported in "(2012) 10 SCC 303", the proceedings impugned are liable to be quashed. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to this prayer. In view of the above and considering the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of "Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab" reported in "(2012) 10 SCC 303", "Hitesh Verma v. State of Uttarakhand, (2020) 10 SCC 710" and "Ishwar Pratap Singh v. State of U.P., (2018) 13 SCC 612" and "Narinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and another, (2014) 6 SCC 466", as well as the fact that the compromise entered between the parties has been verified vide order dated 12.02.2025 by A.C.J.M.-1, Lakhimpur Kheri, the proceedings of Complaint Case No. 275/2018 (New case No. 2646/2021) "Ram prasad @ Shiv Sagar @ Pujari Vs. Parasuram and another", under sections 419/420/471 I.P.C., P.S. Mitauli, District Lakhimpure Kheri, pending before the ACJM-1, Lakhimpur Kheri, are hereby quashed. The petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 11.3.2025 R.C. Digitally signed by :- RAM CHANDER YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench