118 IN THE HIGH COURT THE STATE OF HARYANA ROHIT AND ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. Abhinash Jain, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Pritam Singh Saini, Advocate and Mr. Sharad Aggarwal, Advocate for Market Committee. Mr. A.S. Virk, Advocate, Mr. Vivek Aggarwal, Advocate, Mr. S.S. Momi, Advocate, Mr. Rohit Singh, Advocate, Mr. R.S. Longia, Advocate for the landowners. HARKESH MANUJA For orders, see “ Sharma Vs. State of Haryana and Anr.”, date. Pending application(s), if any, shall also 05.12.2025 Tejwinder IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: THE STATE OF HARYANA Versus ROHIT AND ORS. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Abhinash Jain, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Pritam Singh Saini, Advocate and Mr. Sharad Aggarwal, Advocate for Market Committee. Mr. A.S. Virk, Advocate, Mr. Vivek Aggarwal, Advocate, Mr. S.S. Momi, Advocate, Mr. Rohit Singh, Advocate, Mr. R.S. Longia, Advocate for the landowners. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) For orders, see “RFA No.2662 Sharma Vs. State of Haryana and Anr.”, Pending application(s), if any, shall also (HARKESH MANUJA) Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RFA-2986-2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: December 05, 2025 ........Appellant ........Respondents HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Abhinash Jain, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Pritam Singh Saini, Advocate and Mr. Sharad Aggarwal, Advocate for Market Committee. Mr. R.S. Longia, Advocate for the landowners. RFA No.2662-2011”, titled as “Sarla Sharma Vs. State of Haryana and Anr.”, decided vide order of even Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No (O&M) December 05, 2025 “Sarla decided vide order of even TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.12.17 13:12 I agree to specified portions of this document