1 Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:15909 Court No. - 7 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 2405 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ram Achhaibar Singh And Another Respondent :- Addl. Commissioner (Administration) Second Devi Patan Mandal, Gonda And Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Tiwari,Ujjawal Tewari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Gupta Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for the State/opposite party Nos. 1 and 2 as well as Shri Pankaj Gupta, learned counsel for the opposite party No.3 and perused the record. 3. This writ petition has been filed with the following main relief:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari thereby quashing the impugned Certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 24.1.2025 passed by Additional Commissioner (Administration) Second, Devipatan Mandal, Gonda in Case No.1769 of 2024 (Ram Achhaibar Singh & Others Versus Jay Prakash Singh & Others) as contained in Annexure No.1 to this writ petition. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite party No.1 to reconsider the stay application of the petitioners filed along with appeal bearing Case No.1769 of 2024 (Ram Achhaibar Singh & Others Versus Jay Prakash Singh & Others). (iii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus restraining the opposite parties from interfering in peaceful possession of the petitioners over the land in question." 4. The order dated 24.01.2025, passed by the Additional Commissioner (Administration)-II, Devipatan Mandal, Gonda/appellate authority in Case No.1769 of 2024 (Ram Achhaibar Singh & Others Vs. Jay Prakash Singh & Others), which has been instituted under Section 207 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 (in short "Revenue Code") has been challenged by means of the instant writ petition. The order dated 24.01.2025 reads as under :- 2 "24-01-2025 i=koyh vkns'kkFkZ izLrqr gqbZA vihykFkhZ ,oa foi{kh la[;k&1 ds vf/koDrkx.k dh cgl xzkg~;rk ,oa LFkxu ij lquh tk pqdh gSA iz'uxr vihy voj U;k;ky; mi ftykf/kdkjh rjcxat }kjk okn la[;k&Vh 202308300605681 vUrxZRk /kkjk&24 m0iz0jktLo lafgrk ceqdnek t; izdk'k flag cuke jke vNSoj flag vkfn esa ikfjr vkns'k fnukafdr 10-10-2024 ds fo#) fnukad 15-10-2024 dks izLrqr dh xbZ gSA vihy ds fo#) foi{kh la[;k&1 dh vksj ls izLrqr vkifRr i= fnukafdr 07-12-2024 dk Hkh voyksdu fd;k x;kA mifLFkr i{kkas ds fo}ku vf/koDrkx.k }kjk izLrqr rdksZa dks lquus ,oa i=koyh ds voyksduksijkUr vihy dh iks"k.kh;rk esa cy izrhr gksrk gSA rn~uqlkj vihy lquokbZ gsrq xzkg; dh tkrh gSA tgkW rd LFkxu fn;s tkus dk iz'u gSA LFkxu izkFkZuk i= eas vihykUV us Lo;a dk xkVk izHkkfor gksus dk dFku vafdr fd;k gS] fdUrq voj U;k;ky; dh i=koyh ij miyC/k jkTkLo fujh{kd dh lhekadu vk[;k esa vihykUV dh xkVk dks izHkkfor gksus dk mYys[k ugha fd;k x;k gSA ,slh n'kk esa LFkxu fn;s tkus dk vkSfpR; izrhr ugha gksrk gSA rn~uqlkj LFkxu izkFkZuk i= fujLrkfjr fd;k tkrk gSA voj U;k;ky; dh i=koyh izkIr gksdj vihy i=koyh ds lkFk layXu gSA blfy, i=koyh xq.k&nks"k ij cgl gsrq fnukad 12-02-2025 dks is'k gksA muoku ys[kd& gLrk{kj vij vk;qDr iz'kklu f}rh; nsohikVu e.My xks.Mk" 5. A bare reading of the impugned order dated 24.01.2025, indicates that the appellate authority has rejected the application seeking interim protection in relation to the final order dated 24.01.2024, passed in Case No.5681 of 2023 (Jay Prakash Singh Vs. Ram Acchaibar Singh and others), instituted under Section 24 of the Revenue Code, after taking note of the fact that for the purposes of seeking interim protection the appellant has stated that on account of the order dated 24.01.2024 his Gata is affecting and the report of the Revenue Inspector dated 25.07.2023 indicates that his Gata, i.e. Gata No.559 indicated in the objection as also in the memo of appeal is not affecting. 6. To impeach the aforesaid observation, no document has been placed on record, as such, without observing in relation to the boundaries of Gata No. 559, belonging to the petitioner, as the same would affect the merit of the pending appeal, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the appellate authority to dispose of the pending appeal by a reasoned and speaking order, most expeditiously, say within a period of three months from the next date fixed. 7. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 19.3.2025 ML/- Digitally signed by :- MUNNA LAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench