ANSARI AFRAZ AHMED MOHAMMED AYYUB v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
CRLP/3254/2025 · 2025-04-09
T Mallikarjuna Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12747 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12747 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010152012025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] WEDNESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3254/2025 Between: Ansari Afraz Ahmed Mohammed Ayyub ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:
1. DUGGIRALA SUBASH Counsel for the Respondent/complainant:
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following Order:-
This Criminal Petition under Section 482 of B.N.S.S., is filed by the petitioner herein/A3 seeking to grant anticipatory bail in Crime No.311 of 2024 of Rajahmundry I Town Police Station, registered for the offence punishable under Section 305(a) of the BNS.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing for some time, has confined his argument to the extent of protecting the petitioner herein from the coercive action by the police on the ground that the offence alleged are punishable with imprisonment of seven years and prays this Court to direct the police to follow the procedure as contemplated under Section 35(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
3. On the other hand, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor did not oppose the same and concurred with the submission made by the
2
learned counsel for the petitioner for the reason that the offence alleged are punishable with imprisonment of seven years.
4. Heard. Perused the material on record.
5. Since the offence alleged are punishable with imprisonment of seven years, this Court directs the police to follow the procedure as contemplated under Section 35(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, scrupulously, as per the guidelines enunciated in Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar and another1. The petitioner shall comply with the conditions, without any default.
6. With the above directions, the Criminal Petition is disposed of.
Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
_____________________________ JUSTICE T.MALLIKARJUNA RAO
Date: 09.04.2025 ASR
1 (2014) 8 SCC 273
3
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.MALLIKARJUNA RAO
Criminal Petition No.3254 of 2025
Date: 09.04.2025
ASR