FAIZ ALIAS MUNNA ALIAS FAIZ MOHAMMAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
CRLR/284/2025 · 2025-03-07
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 127409 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 127409 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Court No. - 16 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 284 of 2025 Revisionist :- Faiz Alias Munna Alias Faiz Mohammad Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Gulam Mustafa Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. Heard learned counsel for the revisionist and learned AGA for the State. Notice to respondent no. 2 is dispensed with in view of the proposed order. By this revision, the revisionist seeks following relief:-
"WHEREFORE it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to set aside the impugned order dated 10. 1. 2025 passed by Principal Judge Family Court Unnao in case no. 39/2024 U/S 125 Cr. P.C./144 BNSS P.S. District Unnao Styled Smt. Rukhsar Bano and another Versus Faiz alias Munna and allow the revision in the interest of justice." Perused the record. It is not in dispute that respondent no. 2 is legally wedded wife of the revisionist and respondent no. 3 is his minor son. Respondent no. 2 and 3 have been neglected and they are residing from the revisionist for a sufficient cause. They are destitute and unable to maintain themselves. I find the revisionist is capable of maintaining the private respondents. Thus, I find no illegality in the order impugned. The revision is devoid of merits and is accordingly dismissed. Order Date :- 7.3.2025 R.C. Digitally signed by :- RAM CHANDER YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench