MOHAMMAD ANWAR SAIF(SINCE DECEASED) THR LR v. TARUN KUMAR
CR/3868/2024 · 2025-11-27
Alka Sarin
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 127380 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 127380 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
321 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR-3868-2024 (O&M)
Date of Decision : 27.11.2025
Mohammad Anwar Saifi deceased through LRs ... Petitioner Versus Tarun Kumar
... Respondent
CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : None
ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral)
1.
On 11.07.2025 the following order was passed :
“As per the office report notice could not be issued to the respondent due to non-filing of process fee. On filing of process fee within two weeks from today, let fresh notice be issued to the respondent returnable
27.11.2025. Dasti as well. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to serve the respondent through the counsel representing him before the Appellate Authority concerned. It is made clear that pendency of the present revision petition shall not be an impediment in continuation of the proceedings before the Court concerned. Let a copy of this
order be conveyed to the Court concerned.”
2.
Till date the process fee has not been filed hence notice could be issued to the respondent. Today also none has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner. In view thereof, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the present petition for non-prosecution.
3.
Dismissed for non-prosecution. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off.
27.11.2025 Ankur Goyal
( ALKA SARIN ) JUDGE NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking
Whether reportable: YES/NO ANKUR GOYAL 2025.11.28 10:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this
order/judgment