ANIL KUMAR TRIPATHI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. FOREST. ANUBHAG III ENVIROMENT CLIMATE CHANGE LKO AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/2716/2025 · 2025-03-10
Alok Mathur
Civil Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 127377 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 127377 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:14347 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2716 of 2025 Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Tripathi Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Forest. Anubhag Iii Enviroment Climate Change Lko And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Raghvendra P. Singh,Mohd. Sheraj Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Standing counsel for the respondents.
2. By means of the present writ petition the petitioner, who is working as Group D employee since 5.7.2009 continuously without any break in Ambedkar Nagar Forest Division, has prayed for grant of Rs.18,000/- per month as minimum regular pay scale in place of Rs.5,226/- per month pursuant to the order dated 20.3.2023 issued by the State Government and the order dated 5.4.2023 issued by respondent No.2 in compliance of the
judgment dated 21.2.2002 passed in Civil Appeal No.3634 of 1998 (State of U.P. Vs. Putti Lal), (2002) 2 UPLBEC 1595 as well as judgment and order dated 14.11.2018 passed in Civil Appeal No.10956 of 2013 (Sabha Shankar Dubey Vs. D.F.O. and others, (2019) 12 SCC 297 of Hon'ble Supreme Court.
3. After arguing the matter at some length learned counsel for the petitioner confines his prayer for a suitable direction to the opposite parties to decide petitioner's representation, expeditiously.
4. Learned Standing counsel does not object to the prayer made as aforesaid.
5. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation to the authority concerned within two weeks from today. In case, such a representation is received the authority concerned shall proceed to consider and decide the same expeditiously, preferably within six weeks thereafter in accordance with law by passing a reasoned and speaking order keeping in view the judgment dated 21.2.2002 passed in Civil Appeal No.3634 of 1998 (State of U.P. Vs. Putti Lal), (2002) 2 UPLBEC 1595 as well as
judgment and order dated 14.11.2018 passed in Civil Appeal No.10956 of 2013 (Sabha Shankar Dubey Vs. D.F.O. and others, (2019) 12 SCC 297 of Hon'ble Supreme Court. . (Alok Mathur, J.)
Order Date :- 10.3.2025 RKM. Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench