OM KAR AND 4 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE SECTT. LKO AND 4 OTHERS
WRIB/214/2025 · 2025-04-30
Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 127348 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 127348 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:24849 Court No. - 7 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 214 of 2025 Petitioner :- Om Kar And 4 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Sectt. Lko And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajendra Singh,Manjeet Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Instructions filed by the State is taken on record. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners as also Sri Tej Bali Singh, learned Additional Chief State Counsel and perused the records. In view of the order proposed to be passed by this Court, notice to the private-respondents is dispensed with. The instant petition has been preferred seeking following main relief(s):-
"Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing to Consolidation Director/Commissioner, Uttar Pradesh Lucknow, the opp. Party no.2 to cancel the notification dated after summing 06.02.2015 under Section 4 A (2) of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953, in respect of Village- Nihalpur, Block-Safipur Tehsil-Safipur, District- Unnao. II. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing to Consolidation Director/Commissioner, Uttar Pradesh Lucknow, the Opp. Party No.2 to take a decision upon the application dated 08.02.2025 (Annexure No. 10) for cancelling the notification dated 06.02.2015 under Section 4 A (2) of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953, in respect of Village- Nihalpur, Block-Safipur Tehsil- Safipur, District- Unnao." Taking note of the pronouncements of this Court on the issue rendered in the case(s) of Suraj Bhan vs. Director, Consolidation, Uttar Pradesh, reported in 2006 LawSuit(All) 971, Runup Gramodyog Evam Sewa Sansthan Versus State of U.P. and Others, reported in 2022 (155) RD 497 and Daswant Ram Versus Consolidation Commissioner and Others, reported in 2015 (126) RD 669, this Court is not inclined to entertain this petition for the main relief sought, quoted above. Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of finally with liberty to the petitioner to prefer a detailed representation in terms of Rule 17 of U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Rules, 1954 (in short "Rules of 1954"), which shall be considered and decided by the Authority concerned in the light of law on the subject including Rule 17 of the Rules of 1954, most expeditiously. Order Date :- 30.4.2025 Mohit Singh/- Digitally signed by :- MOHIT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench