Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:141933 Court No. - 89 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1322 of 2014 Petitioner :- Smt. Sangeeta And Anr. Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Anr. Counsel for Petitioner :- Brijesh Pratap Mishra,Kamlesh Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- Bipin Lal Srivastava,Siddhartha Varma Hon'ble Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.
1. The case is taken up on mentioning.
2. Heard Sri Anish Kumar Sinha, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Kamlesh Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Vinayak Verma, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Siddhartha Varma,
learned counsel for opposite party no.2 and Sri B. P. Singh, learned AGA for the State-opposite party no.1.
3. This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred with prayer to quash the order dated 30.10.2013, passed by learned Additional District Judge, Court No.12, Ghaziabad, in Criminal Revision No.278 of 2013(Smt. Sangeeta Vs. Praveendhar) and the order dated 29.05.2013, passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, Ghaziabad, in Case No.1123 of 2007 (Smt. Sangeeta and others Vs. Praveendhar), under section 125 Cr.P.C.
4. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioner nos.1 and 2 are the wife and daughter of opposite party no.2. He further submits that petitioners and opposite party no.2 have settled their dispute amicably through mediation and conciliation centre of this Court and the report regarding settlement sent by the mediation center of this Court is already on
record. Learned counsel for the petitioners further prays that in view of the settlement arrived at between the petitioners and opposite party no.2, before the mediation centre of this Court, the proceeding of the aforesaid case be quashed.
5. On the other hand, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and learned AGA for the State have no objection to the above
submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners. 6 In view of the fact that petitioners and opposite party no.2 have settled their dispute through mediation center of this Court and the report sent by the mediation center regarding said settlement is available on record and taking note of the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Laxmi Narayan and others, AIR 2019 SC 1296 and the facts of the matter, it would be in the interest of justice that the impugned orders/proceedings be quashed, in respect of the petitioners.
7. In view of the aforesaid, the order dated 30.10.2013, passed by learned Additional District Judge, Court No.12, Ghaziabad, in Criminal Revision No.278 of 2013(Smt. Sangeeta Vs. Praveendhar) and the order dated 29.05.2013, passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, Ghaziabad, in Case No.1123 of 2007 (Smt. Sangeeta and others Vs. Praveendhar), under section 125 Cr.P.C., are hereby quashed.
8. The writ petition is hereby allowed.
Order Date :- 19.8.2025 VKG Digitally signed by :- VIJAY KUMAR GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad