Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CrlM No. 1790/2025 in CRM(M) No. 667/2023
Sarita Kohli & Anr.
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Pranav Khajuria, Advocate
vs
Malvika Gupta .…Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Navyug Sethi, Advocate
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE
ORDER (17.10.2025)
01. This application has been moved by the petitioners for the correction of a typographical error, in judgment dated 26.08.2025, passed by this Court in CRM(M) No. 667/2023. The aforesaid judgment came to be disposed of with the consent of learned counsel for the respondent that he had no objection to the petition and to quashment of the impugned order. However, a typographical error crept in the said judgment that impugned order is upheld.
02. In view of the above, the present application is allowed by providing that the impugned Order dated 27.07.2023, passed by learned Principal Sessions Judge, Jammu, in CRM(M) No. 667/2023 be read as “quashed”.
03.
Disposed of.
(RAJESH SEKHRI)
JUDGE
Jammu 17.10.2025 Sapna Serial No. 94