Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 127266 (ALL)

RANJEET YADAV @ AMBRISH YADAV AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

A482/2111/2025 · 2025-03-07

Om Prakash Shukla

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:13962 Court No. - 30 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2111 of 2025 Applicant :- Ranjeet Yadav @ Ambrish Yadav And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Prashant Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. 1. Heard Shri Prashant Singh, learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State as well as Shri Shivam Srivastava, learned Counsel appearing for opposite party No. 2 who has filed vakalatnama, the same is taken on record. 2. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the dispute between the parties has been amicably settled outside the Court by way of compromise which is on record as Annexure No. 3 to the application. It is further submitted that since the dispute has been settled outside the Court by the parties, the said compromise may be directed to be verified by the competent authority so that the impugned proceedings may be quashed on the basis of said compromise and its verification report. 3. Learned A.G.A. as well as learned counsel for opposite party No.2 has no objection to the innocuous prayer made by learned Counsel for the applicants. 4. In view of the above, the parties are directed to appear before the learned trial court on 18.03.2025 along with the copy of original compromise deed, who shall verify the compromise in presence of the parties within two weeks thereafter and keep a report of the verification on the record of the Court after providing its copy to the parties. 5. For a period of two months, the proceedings of Case No.116142/2022, Case Crime No.116/2020 under Section 323, 504 and 506 I.P.C., Police Station-Mohanlalganj, District- Lucknow pending in the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate III, Lucknow, shall be kept in abeyance. 6. In view of the above, the petition is disposed of. 7. Liberty to the parties is granted to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings on the basis of compromise and its verification. 8. Office is directed to return the original compromise as well as certified copies of the documents filed along with the petition, if any, to learned counsel for the applicants as per Rules of the Court. (Om Prakash Shukla, J.) Order Date :- 7.3.2025 -Piyush- Digitally signed by :- PIYUSH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench