Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 127250 (ALL)

LALTA PRASAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIC/2279/2025 · 2025-03-11

Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:14719-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 2279 of 2025 Petitioner :- Lalta Prasad Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Govind Kumar Chourasia Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. 1. Heard Sri Govind Kumar Chourasia, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner says that the land in question has been settled in his favour under Section 67-A of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, but, the opposite party no. 6, a private party is encroaching on the said land, whereas, the learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel invites our attention to the page 22 of the writ petition which is a report alleging encroachment by the petitioner. 3. Be that as it may, whatever be the factual position it is apparent that this is a private dispute involving factual dispute. The writ petition is not maintainable in such a matter. The petitioner may avail other remedies. 4. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of. . (Om Prakash Shukla,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Order Date :- 11.3.2025 R.K.P. Digitally signed by :- RAJ KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench