Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12724 (CHH)

MANORANJAN SAHU v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/896/2025 · 2025-08-13

Shri Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 896 of 2025 Manoranjan Sahu S/o Shiba Sahu Aged About 42 Years R/o Village Gathiyapali, Police Station Ambabhouna, Tahsil And District Bargarh (Odisha), ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The District Magistrate/Collector, District Sarangarh -Bilaigarh (C.G.) 2 - Station House Officer, Police Station Sariya, District Sarangarh - Bilaigarh (C.G.) 3 - Anil Bhoi S/o Bhagbatiya Bhoi Aged About 26 Years R/o Village Gathiyapali, Police Station Ambabhauna, Bargad (Odisha) 4 - Gulab Behra S/o Ghanshyam Behra Aged About 58 Years R/o Village Sankara, Police Station Sariya, District Sarangarh-Bilaigarh (C.G.) 5 - Chhinu Sidar (Bhoy) S/o Late Jhaaru Sidar (Bhoy) Aged About 58 Years R/o Village Sankara, Police Station Sariya, District Sarangarh - Bilaigarh (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : None For State : Mr. Akhilesh Kumar, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal Order On Board Digitally signed by BHOLA NATH KHATAI Date: 2025.08.14 17:17:30 +0530 2 14/08/2025 1. The present petition under Section 528 of BNSS has been filed challenging the order dated 23.12.2024 passed by the Collector, District Sarangarh-Bilaigarh (CG) in Revenue Case No.202409321300022/A-47/2023-24 whereby the application filed by the petitioner for releasing the seizied vehicle on Supurdnama has been rejected. 2. There was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on the previous date of hearing. 3. Today also there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner which shows that he is not interested in pursuing the petition any further. 4. In the absence of any representation on behalf of the petitioner, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the petition for want of prosecution. 5. Accordingly, the present CRMP stands dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) JUDGE Khatai