Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12723 (BOM)

BHAVNA PRASHANT MUNDE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS

WP/4660/2025 · 2025-04-08

Shri Kishore C Sant

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Ethape ( 1 ) 44-WP-4660-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 44 WRIT PETITION NO. 4660 OF 2025 Bhavna Prashant Munde VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra Through Secretary And Others ... Mr. Rajendra Deshmukh, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Jay Veer and Vikhyati Jain i/by Mr. Kamlakar J. Suryawanshi, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. A. D. Sonkawade h/f Mr. Suhas R. Shirsat, Advocate for Respondent No.4. Mr. K. N. Lokhande, AGP for Respondent-State. CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT, J. DATE : 8th APRIL 2025 PC :- 1. At the outset, the learned Senior Advocate, on instructions, submits that the petitioner is not pressing the prayer against the inquiry report and the proceeding. Petitioner’s limited prayer is only to the extent of challenge to the order dated 27th August 2024. 2. After hearing the learned Advocates for the parties, this Court expressed the reservation about maintainability of the petition. 3. In view of the same, petition is not pressed, on instructions. Ethape ( 2 ) 44-WP-4660-2025 4. Request is made for direction to the authorities to decide the complaint as early as possible and within stipulated period. 5. Considering above, the concerned authorities is expected to complete the inquiry as early as possible and preferably within six months from today. 6. This Court has not observed anything on merits. 7. This Court had heard the challenge only to the extent of prayers in the petition. [KISHORE C. SANT, J.]