VIRENDRA SINGH YADAV AND 6 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/2120/2025 · 2025-03-07
Om Prakash Shukla
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 127225 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 127225 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:14050 Court No. - 30 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2120 of 2025 Applicant :- Virendra Singh Yadav And 6 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ashok Kumar Srivastava,Avinash Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and Shri Arun Kumar Singh Parihar, who has filed his vakalatnama on behalf of the respondent No.2 today in the Court, which is taken on record. 2. The instant application seeks quashing of the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.2124/2015, arising out of Case Crime No.442/2013, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station Malihabad, District Lucknow pending before learned Special Chief Judicial Magistrate (Custom), Lucknow. 3. Learned counsel for the parties submit that the applicants and respondent no.2 have amicably settled their dispute outside the court vide compromise dated 29.04.2022, copy of which is on record as Annexure-6 to the application. 4. Further it has been submitted by learned counsel for the applicants that in compliance of order passed by this Court dated 11.05.2022, the compromise has been verified by the learned trial court. 5. Learned counsel for respondent no.2 concedes the argument made by learned counsel for the applicants. 6. Learned counsel for the parties submits that in view of the judgments of Hon'ble Apex Court in B. S. Joshi and others versus State of Haryana and another :(2003) 4 SCC 675, Nikhil Merchant versus C.B.I. and another : (2008) 9 SCC 677, Manoj Sharma versus State and others : (2008) 16 SCC 1, Gian Singh versus State of Punjab: (2010) 15 SCC 118 and Narinder Singh and others versus State of Punjab and another: (2014) 6 SCC 466, the proceedings pending before learned trial court are liable to be quashed. 7. In view of the fact that the parties have settled their dispute outside the Court by way of compromise and from perusal of the record it appears that the compromise has been verified by the learned trial court and the verification report dated 26.05.2022 is on record as well as law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the cases (supra), the present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is allowed and the criminal proceedings (supra) are hereby quashed.
(Om Prakash Shukla,J.) Order Date :- 7.3.2025 Saurabh Digitally signed by :- SAURABH VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench