Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:14368 WP No. 345 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 345 OF 2024 (S-RES) BETWEEN:
SRI. LAKSHMAN S/O LATE CHENNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/AT NO. 105, 2ND MAIN ROAD, 9TH CROSS, LOKANAYAKA NAGAR, HEBBALU, METAGALLI POST, MYSURU-570016
PRESENTLY WORKING AS POURAKARMIKA, MYSURU CITY CORPORATION, MYSURU. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. PRATHIBHA JAIN, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. RAJASHEKAR S., ADVOCATE) AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA, DR. B.R AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. DISTRICT URBAN DEVELOPMENT CELL OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, MYSUR DISTRICT, MYSURU, REP. BY PRESIDENT, SELECTION AND DIRECT RECRUITMENT AUTHORITY AND DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, MYSURU DISTRICT-571129. Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:14368 WP No. 345 of 2024
3. MYSURU CITY CORPORATION MYSURU-570004 REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHIVAPRABHU S. HIREMATH, ADDITIONAL GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NOS.1 AND 2;
SMT. GEETHADEVI M. PAPANNA, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.3)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENDORSEMENT DATED 15.12.2023 VIDE NO. CEAST(4)/CR/16/2023-24 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ
ORAL ORDER The petitioner has sought for a writ in the nature of certiorari to quash an endorsement bearing No.CEAST(4) / CR/ 16/ 2023-24 dated 15.12.2023 and has sought for a writ in the nature of mandamus to direct the respondents to consider his case for appointment as Pourakarmika pursuant to the application dated 25.06.2018. 2. When this writ petition was listed for preliminary hearing in 'B' group, the learned counsel for the respondent No.3 submitted that the petitioner was recruited as a
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:14368 WP No. 345 of 2024
Pourakarmika on 07.02.2024 under Karnataka Municipalities (Recruitment of Pourakarmikas in City Municipal Councils, Town Municipal Councils and Town Panchayats)(Special) Rules, 2022. 3. Therefore, the relief sought for in the writ petition is already granted to the petitioner. Hence, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
It is open for the petitioner to seek revival of this writ petition if the above statement of the learned counsel for respondent No.3 is incorrect. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE
BKN/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 23