Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12719 (KAR)

T DASAPPASHETTY v. RATHNAMMA

WP/1655/2018 · 2025-04-01

M I Arun

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:13631 WP No. 1655 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO. 1655 OF 2018 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. T. DASAPPASHETTY T. BALASHETTY AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS R/O. BELLUR TOWN NAGAMANGALA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT-571 418 2. SMT. NANJAMMA W/O LAKSHMINARAYANASHETTY AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS R/O. BELLUR TOWN NAGAMANGALA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT-571 418 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. BHARGAV G., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. RATHNAMMA W/O T.H. BALASHETTY AGED ABAOUT 50 YEARS R/O. BELLUR TOWN NAGAMANGALA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT-571 418 2. H. PRIYADARSHINI W/O KEMPARAJU D/O GANGADHARGOWDA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS R/O. CHANDRANAHALLI Digitally signed by H K HEMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:13631 WP No. 1655 of 2018 BELLUR HOBLI AND POST NAGAMANGALA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT-571 418 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. Y.K. NARAYANA SHARMA, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED IN FDP No.6/2013 ON 11.12.2017 ON THE FILE OF CIVIL JDUGE AND JMFC NAGAMANGALA VIDE ANNEXURE-C BY ISSUE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN ORAL ORDER On 26.03.2025, the following order was passed: "Learned Advocate for the petitioners submits that respondent No.1 has died and she has no legal heir and there is no requirement to bring anybody on record. His submission is placed on record. The writ petition stands abated insofar as it relates to respondent No.1. When the matter is called out, learned advocate for the petitioners is not in a position to go on with the matter. At his request, finally, call on 01.04.2025." 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners is not present, when the matter is called out. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:13631 WP No. 1655 of 2018 3. The writ petition is of the year 2018. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE RAK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1