RAHUL YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
BAIL/2164/2025 · 2025-03-17
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 127172 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 127172 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:15667 Court No. - 15 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 2164 of 2025 Applicant :- Rahul Yadav Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Manish Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
1. Heard Sri Manish Tiwari, the learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Rakesh Kumar Singh, the learned AGA for the State and Sri Ankur Pandey, the learned counsel for the informant. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 0225/2024, under Sections 376(2) N, 504, 506 I.P.C. and 5/6 POCSO Act, Police Station Sammanpur, District Ambedkar Nagar. 3.The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of F.I.R. lodged on 25.10.2024 alleging that the applicant has repeatedly made physical relations with the informant under allurement of marrying her and when she became pregnant the applicant administered some medicine resulting in her miscarriage. The informant further alleged that the applicant is virally spreading her photos and videos. 4. In the statement of the informant recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C, she supported the FIR allegations. 5. In the affidavit filed in support of the bail application, it has been stated that the applicant is a young man aged 22 years, he has been falsely implicated in the present case and he has no criminal history. 6. The medico legal examination report of the informant did not reveal any mark of injury- external or internal, or any sign of use of force. 7. A supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the applicant disclosing his involvement in 4 other cases, in one of which the Investigating Officer has submitted final report and in one case the applicant has been granted bail. 8. The informant has filed a short counter affidavit stating that the family members of the informant and the applicant are ready for their marriage. A copy of the statement of the informant recorded by the trial court has also been annexed with this short counter affidavit wherein she has been declared hostile. 9. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. 10. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 11.
Let the applicant-Rahul Yadav be released on bail in the aforementioned case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court. . [Subhash Vidyarthi, J.] Order Date :- 17.3.2025 Pradeep/- Digitally signed by :- PRADEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench