Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Ex. Petition No.384 of 2025 Date of Decision: 29.05.2025 ____________________________________________________ Rakesh Kumar & others ....Petitioners Versus State of HP & others …Respondents _____________________________________________________ Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 No. ________________________________________________ For the petitioners : Mr. A.K. Gupta & Ms. Babita, Advocates. For the respondent : Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr.Ramakant Sharma, Mr. Navlesh Verma,
Ms.
Sharmila
Patial, Mr.Sushant
Kaprate,
Additional Advocates General and Mr. Raj Negi, Deputy Advocate General. ________________________________________________ Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioners fairly submits that since the order, sought to be executed, has been complied with, therefore, this petition has been rendered infructuous. His statement is taken on record. 1 ? Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2
2. Accordingly, the present execution petition is
disposed of as fully satisfied. (Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge (Sushil Kukreja) May 29, 2025 Judge (VH)