Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 127101 (ALL)

ARJUN PRATAP SINGH v. SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, MANKAPUR TEHSIL DISTT. GONDA AND 5 OTHERS

WRIC/2205/2025 · 2025-03-10

Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:14522-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 2205 of 2025 Petitioner :- Arjun Pratap Singh Respondent :- Sub Divisional Magistrate, Mankapur Tehsil Distt. Gonda And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjay Shanker Pandey,Pawan Kumar Srivastav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Gupta Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. 1. Heard. 2. The boundary marks which were put in exercise of jurisdiction under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 have been disturbed, as claimed, hence, this petition. 3. The remedy is before the Sub Divisional Magistrate as in such an eventuality he has authority and jurisdiction to restore the boundary marks and also to take such other action as is prescribed under the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, therefore, if the petitioner moves an application before the opposite party no. 1 - Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Mankapur, District Gonda, he shall get the facts verified and do the needful as per law, but, after hearing the affected parties and a decision be taken within four weeks. 4. The petition is disposed of. [Om Prakash Shukla, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.] Order Date :- 10.3.2025 Santosh/- Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench