ARIF QINAYET v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPTT. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIC/2212/2025 · 2025-03-12
Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 127098 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 127098 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:15088-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 2212 of 2025 Petitioner :- Arif Qinayet Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Rural Development Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohammad Alishah Faruqi,Mohammad Shafeeque Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rishabh Kapoor Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J.
1. Power filed by Shri Aditya Mohan, Advocate on behalf of the opposite party No.2 is taken on record.
2. None appears for the petitioner, however, learned Counsel for the opposite party No.2 and learned Standing Counsel for the State are present.
3. The relief prayed is in the nature of Mandamus to the opposite party No.2 to remove the pipelines laid on the land of Dargah Mohammad Shah Baba situated at Khasra No.9639/0.519 Village Bahadurpur, District-Amethi. The petitioner may avail other remedies as the dispute may involve inquiry into facts, which may require evidence or he may approach the concerned officials of the U.P. Jal Nigam raising his grievance, who may get the facts verified, if possible, and do the needful as per law.
4. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the writ petition is
disposed of. (Om Prakash Shukla, J.) (Rajan Roy, J.)
Order Date :- 12.3.2025 -Piyush- Digitally signed by :- PIYUSH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench