Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 127072 (ALL)

MOHD. SAUD KHAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE LKO AND OTHERS

WRIC/2416/2025 · 2025-03-11

Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:14807-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 2416 of 2025 Petitioner :- Mohd. Saud Khan Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue Lko And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dr. Pooja Singh,Ankit Pandey,Anshuman Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. Shri Ram Kumar Singh, learned Advocate has filed his vakalatnama on behalf of respondent No.4, which is taken on record. Heard. The petitioner alleges interference and encroachment by respondent No.4 upon the petitioner's land bearing Gata No.389/1 and Gata No.389/2. However, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.4 says that construction is being undertaken on Gata No.484 and not on the petitioner's gata. In view of the aforesaid, the petitioner may avail other remedies as may be prescribed under law and if any proceeding for demarcation of his land are pending before the respondent No.3, then if there is no other legal impediment, the respondent No.3 shall conclude the proceedings at the earliest say within six weeks. If as a result of such demarcation, it is found that the construction has been undertaken by the respondent No.4 on the land of the petitioner, then remedial measures will have to be taken by the respondent No.4 unless the petitioner accepts compensation for the encroached land or agrees to sell it. The present petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. (Om Prakash Shukla,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Order Date :- 11.3.2025 Gurpreet Singh Digitally signed by :- GURPREET SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench