ABHISHEK SINGH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. HOME LKO. AND 8 OTHERS
CRLP/1893/2025 · 2025-03-06
Brij Raj Singh, Vivek Chaudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 127056 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 127056 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:13781-DB Court No. - 10 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1893 of 2025 Petitioner :- Abhishek Singh And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. And 8 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Yash Pal Singh,Neeraj Kumar Rai,Ramesh Chandra Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A.
2. This petition has been filed with the following prayers:-
"(i) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the Police of Police Station-Aashiyana, Lucknow Commissionerate, Lucknow (Respondent No. 6) 7 and 8 not to harass the petitioners without following due process of law and not to summon them to the Police Station/Police Chowki without following the provisions of the B.N.S.S./Cr.P.C.; ii.) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the Commissioner of Police-Lucknow, Lucknow Commissionerate, Lucknow (Respondent. No. 3) to take appropriate action against the Police personnel who are acting beyond their statutory duty and abusing the due process of the law in light of email dated 16.02.2025 which were sent to him as contained in Annexure No. 5 and 6 to the writ petition; iii) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondent No. 1 to take suitable action against the Police personnel who are violating the direction of the Hon'ble Court passed in W.P. No. 80 (H/C) of 2022 on 11.04.2022 as contained in Annexure No. 7 to the writ petition;"
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner are being harassed by the police without any complaint/F.I.R.
4. Learned A.G.A., on the basis of the instructions, submits that there is dispute between the husband and wife. They have been summoned under Section 126/135 B.N.S.S. Now they are no more required by the police and at this stage no complaint has been lodged against the petitioners. Therefore, the petitioner
shall not be harassed unnecessary.
5. The above statement made by the learned A.G.A. is taken on record.
6. The writ petition is disposed of in view of the statement made by the learned A.G.A. [Brij Raj Singh, J.] [Vivek Chaudhary, J.] Order Date :- 6.3.2025 Anuj Singh Digitally signed by :- ANUJ PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench