Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 127048 (MAD)

The District Forest Officer v. The Forest Range Officer

WP(MD)/6388/2023 · 2025-04-28

Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.(MD)No.6388 of 2023 and W.M.P.(MD)No.6047 of 2023 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 28.04.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR W.P.(MD)No.6388 of 2023 and W.M.P.(MD)No.6047 of 2023 The District Forest Officer, Madurai Forest Division, Madurai District. ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Forest Range Officer, Forest Range, Usilampatty. 2.M.Malaichamy ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the Labour court, Madurai in EP.No.21 of 2019 in C.P.No.7 of 2015 dated 24.11.2022 and quash the same as illegal and for consequential direction to the Labour court, Madurai to rehear the C.P.No.07 of ____________ p. 2 W.P.(MD)No.6388 of 2023 and W.M.P.(MD)No.6047 of 2023 2015 by remanding the same to file of the Labour court, Madurai by impleading the necessary parties. For Petitioner : Mr.Veerakathiravan, Addl. Advocate General Assisted by Mr.R.Ragavendran, Government Advocate For Respondents : Mr.M.Pounraj for R2 O R D E R When the matter earlier came up for consideration before this Court on 11.03.2025 and 08.04.2025, it was submitted by learned Government Advocate that the petitioner herein is not contesting the Writ Petition any more and is inclined to pay the amount claimed by the respondent No.2 in E.P.No.21 of 2019 in C.P.No.7 of 2015. In view of the same, the matter was adjourned to today under the caption 'for reporting compliance'. ____________ p. 3 W.P.(MD)No.6388 of 2023 and W.M.P.(MD)No.6047 of 2023 2. Today, the learned Additional Advocate General submitted that the petitioner would comply with the claim made by the respondent No.2 within a period of six weeks from today. 3. In view of the same, this Writ Petition is closed granting the petitioner to satisfy the claim made by respondent No.2 in E.P.No.21 of 2019 in C.P.No.7 of 2015. In case, if the same is not satisfied within a period of six weeks from today, the Execution Court/Labour Court is at liberty to proceed further in the matter. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 28.04.2025 Neutral Citation: Yes / No Index : Yes / No vsm ____________ p. 4 W.P.(MD)No.6388 of 2023 and W.M.P.(MD)No.6047 of 2023 MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J. vsm To The Forest Range Officer, Forest Range, Usilampatty. W.P.(MD)No.6388 of 2023 and W.M.P.(MD)No.6047 of 2023 28.04.2025 ____________