SMT. RESHMA PASHA v. THE CHIEF REGISTRAR OF BIRTHS AND DEATHS AND ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR
WP/511/2025 · 2025-03-26
M Nagaprasanna
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12704 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12704 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:12763 WP No. 511 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 511 OF 2025 (GM-CC) BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. RESHMA PASHA W/O IMTHIYAZ PASHA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS.
2.
MR. WASEEM PASHA S/O IMTHIYAZ PASHA, AGED ABOUT 15 YEARS.
REPRESENTED BY HIS MOTHER RESHMA PASHA
BOTH RESIDENTS OF:
NO.16/1, 1ST CROSS, MYSURU ROAD, VALMIKI NAGAR, BENGALURU. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI NATARAJA SHARMA S., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE CHIEF REGISTRAR OF BIRTHS AND DEATHS AND ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 7TH FLOOR, VISVESWARAYYA MAIN TOWER, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU – 560 001.
Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:12763 WP No. 511 of 2025
2.
THE JOINT DIRECTOR, REGISTRAR OF BIRTHS AND DEATHS BBMP SHOPPING COMPLEX, BEHIND UPPARPET POLICE STATION, SUBHASH NAGAR, BENGALURU – 560 009. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI MOHAMMED JAFFAR SHAH, AGA FOR R-1;
SRI K.V.BATHE GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R-2)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT R-2 TO CORRECT THE NAME OF P-2 ON HIS BIRTH CERTIFICATE FROM “ROSHAN” TO “WASEEM PASHA” BASED ON THE DOCUMENTATION SUBMITTED; DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO ISSUE A CORRECTED BIRTH CERTIFICATE TO P-2 AT THE EARLIEST, IN VIEW OF THE URGENCY DUE TO HIS IMPENDING BOARD EXAMINATION.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for petitioners submits that the grievance has been redressed pursuant to the order passed by this Court on 10.03.2025 and undertaking given by Sri K.V.Bathe Gowda, learned counsel for respondent No.2 – bank.
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:12763 WP No. 511 of 2025
2. In that light, the petition does not survive for any further consideration. Therefore, the petition is disposed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
NVJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11