Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12704 (HP)

NISHI RANI v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

CWP/7144/2025 · 2025-05-27

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 7144/2025 Decided on: 27.05.2025 Nishi Rani …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents. ………………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate For the respondents: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 3. Mr. Tek Ram Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.4. Jyotsna Rewal Dua , J Notice. Mr. L.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General and Mr. Tek Ram Sharma, learned counsel, accept notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3 and 4, respectively. 2. This writ petition has been filed for the grant of following substantive relief:- “ That the respondents may be ordered to reckon the entire service of the petitioner for the purpose of pension and other retiral benefits w.e.f. the date the petitioner was appointed on temporary basis in the year 1998 and the benefits incidental thereof may be ordered to be paid to the petitioner.” 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has preferred a representation dated 23.01.2025 (Annexure P-3) to respondent No.2/competent authority, however, no concrete action on her representation has been taken till date. Learned counsel further submitted that the petitioner would be satisfied, in case, respondent No.2/competent authority is directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner, in a time bound manner. Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection to this prayer. 4. In view of above submission, the instant writ petition is disposed of by directing respondent No.2/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner, in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from today. The order so passed be also communicated to the petitioner. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 27th May, 2025(rohit)