S. No. 102 Suppl Cause List-1 IN THE HIGH COURT 0F JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) no. 1014/2025 CM no. 2664/2025 Inhabitants of Sankoo Kargil through Ghulam Haider and ors. …Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. S. A. Naik, Advocate Vs. UT of JK and Others (Ministry of Home Affairs) ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. T. M. Shamsi, DSGI with M/s Faizan Ganie, CGC and Bisma Ali, Adv. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL-JUDGE ORDER 14.05.2025 Learned counsel for the petitioners while arguing the matter, when question regarding maintainability of petition raised, has submitted that petitioners would be satisfied if their representation/resolution is considered on merits. Mr. T. M. Shamsi, DSGI, appearing for the respondents, would submit that petitioners have no case and petition is not maintainable. However, he submits that representation/resolution, if any, pending would be considered under law and in terms of policy in vogue. Respondents shall consider and decide the representation/resolution, if any, already made by petitioners, within a period of two months strictly in accordance with the provisions of law and policy in vouge and directions issued from time to time by the Government of India. Disposed of along with connected CM(s). (VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL) JUDGE SRINAGAR 14.05.2025 “Imtiyaz” Imtiyaz Ul Gani I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 16.05.2025 09:33