Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12703 (CHH)

RAVILAL CHAUHAN v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/1742/2025 · 2025-03-11

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:12207 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1742 of 2025 1 - Ravilal Chauhan S/o Lohar Singh Chouhan Aged About 56 Years Posted As Secretary Gram Panchayat Jhagrendih Janpad Panchayat Pithora District - Mahasamund R/o Village Rajpur Janpad Panchayat Pithora District - Mahasamund (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary Panchayat And Rural Development Department Mahanadi Bhawan Naya Raipur Atal Nagar Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Collector Mahasamund District - Mahasamud (C.G.) 3 - Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat Mahasamud District - Mahasamud (C.G.) 4 - Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Pithora District - Mahasamund (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Shri Waquar Naiyer, Advocate For State : Ms. Nupur Trivedi, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 11/03/2025 1. By the instant petition, the petitioner seeks the following reliefs: “10.1 The Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct to respondents to consider revocation of suspension of the petitioner. Digitally signed by GOPAL SINGH Date: 2025.04.03 11:25:40 +0530 2 10.2 The Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent State to grant any other relief which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in favour of the petitioner as per the facts & circumstance of the present case, in the ends of justice.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during pendency of this petition charge sheet has been issued to the petitioner. 3. Since a charge sheet has been issued to the petitioner, the State authorities are directed to conclude the departmental inquiry, if any conducted against the petitioner, in accordance with law. 4. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) JUDGE Gopal Singh