TANIYA GUPTA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. HOME SECTT. LKO AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/1890/2025 · 2025-03-05
Brij Raj Singh, Vivek Chaudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 127025 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 127025 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:13405-DB Court No. - 10 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1890 of 2025 Petitioner :- Taniya Gupta And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Sectt. Lko And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Umesh Chandra Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned AGA for the State-respondents as well as perused the record.
2. This petition seeks issuance of direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned FIR dated 05.02.2025 registered as Case Crime No.30 of 2025, under Sections 352, 351(2) of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita (B.N.S.), 2023 and Sections 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST Act, Police Station Indiranagar, District Lucknow North (Commissionerate Lucknow), with further prayer to not arrest the petitioners in pursuance of the aforesaid FIR.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the offences, as alleged in the FIR, have maximum punishment for the term less than seven years imprisonment, whereas, the police is trying to arrest him, which is against the mandates of Code of Criminal Procedure.
4. Learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the State-respondents has given a statement on behalf of the Investigating Agency that because the offence, allegedly committed by the petitioners, entails sentence of less than seven
years, the provisions of Section 41-A of Cr.P.C. (Now Section 35(3) of BNSS, 2023) shall be strictly followed in terms of
judgment rendered by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar and another reported in (2014) 8 SCC 273.
5. Considering the stand of the Investigating Agency, learned counsel for the petitioners states that let this petition be
disposed of in view of the above said facts.
6. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of in view of the provisions of Section 41-A of Cr.P.C. (now Section 35(3) of B.N.S., 2023) and the law as laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Arnesh Kumar (supra). (Brij Raj Singh, J.) (Vivek Chaudhary, J.)
Order Date :- 5.3.2025 Arnima Digitally signed by :- ARNIMA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench